References

Adler, M. J., & Van Doren, C. (1972). How to read a book (Rev. and updated ed). Simon and Schuster.

Al-Natour, S., Benbasat, I., & Cenfetelli, R. (2011). The Adoption of Online Shopping Assistants: Perceived Similarity as an Antecedent to Evaluative Beliefs. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 12(5). https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00267

Amelang, M., & Schmidt-Atzert, L. (2012). Psychologische Diagnostik. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17001-0

American Psychological Association. (2019). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, 7th Edition. American Psychological Association (APA). https://www.amazon.com/Publication-Manual-American-Psychological-Association/dp/1433805618?SubscriptionId=0JYN1NVW651KCA56C102&tag=techkie-20&linkCode=xm2&camp=2025&creative=165953&creativeASIN=1433805618

Ariely, D. (2012). Die halbe Wahrheit ist die beste Lüge: Wie wir andere täuschen–und uns selbst am meisten. Droemer.

Ariely, D. (2015). Denken hilft zwar, nützt aber nichts: warum wir immer wieder unvernünftige Entscheidungen treffen (M. Zybak & G. Gockel, Trans.; Vollständige Taschenbuchausgabe). Droemer.

Bangor, A., Kortum, P. T., & Miller, J. T. (2008). An Empirical Evaluation of the System Usability Scale. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 24(6), 574–594. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447310802205776

Bortz, J., & Döring, N. (2006). Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation: Für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler (4. Auflage). Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-540-33306-7

Brembs, B. (2018). Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00037

Brembs, B., Button, K., & Munafò, M. (2013). Deep impact: Unintended consequences of journal rank. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00291

Brown, P. M., George, A. M., & Rickwood, D. J. (2021). Rash impulsivity, reward seeking and fear of missing out as predictors of texting while driving: Indirect effects via mobile phone involvement. Personality and Individual Differences, 171, 110492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110492

Bühner, M. (2011). Einführung in die Test- und Fragebogenkonstruktion. Pearson Studium. https://books.google.de/books?id=Y4990CfV3wgC

Chalmers, A. F., & Chalmers, A. F. (2007). Wege der Wissenschaft: Einführung in die Wissenschaftstheorie (N. Bergemann, Ed.; 6., verb. Aufl). Springer.

Cialdini, R. B. (2017). Die Psychologie des Überzeugens: wie Sie sich selbst und Ihren Mitmenschen auf die Schliche kommen (M. Wengenroth, Trans.; 8., unveränderte Auflage). Hogrefe.

Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159.

Cooper, H. (2020). Reporting standards for research in psychology: Why do we need them? What might they be? In Reporting quantitative research in psychology: How to meet APA Style Journal Article Reporting Standards, 2nd ed (pp. 3–17). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000178-001

Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An introduction to scientific and statistical inference. Palgrave Macmillan.

Dobelli, R., & Lang, B. (2011). Die Kunst des klaren Denkens. Hanser.

DPGs, B. und. (2016). Berufsethische Richtlinien. Berufsverbandes Deutscher Psychologinnen und Psychologen e.V. und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie e.V. https://www.dgps.de/die-dgps/aufgaben-und-ziele/berufsethische-richtlinien

Eid, M., Gollwitzer, M., & Schmitt, M. (2013). Statistik und Forschungsmethoden: Lehrbuch. Mit Online-Materialien. Beltz. http://books.google.de/books?id=bTdHyoIbMSAC

Escalas, J. E., & Stern, B. B. (2003). Sympathy and Empathy: Emotional Responses to Advertising Dramas. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(4), 566–578. https://doi.org/10.1086/346251

Etcoff, N. L., Stock, S., Haley, L. E., Vickery, S. a., & House, D. M. (2011). Cosmetics as a feature of the extended human phenotype: Modulation of the perception of biologically important facial signals. PLoS ONE, 6(10), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025656

Ferreira-Barbosa, H., García-Fernández, J., & Cepeda-Carrión, G. (2023). The Mediating Role of e-Lifestyles to Use the Fitness Center App. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 0(0), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2204273

Fisher, G. G., Matthews, R. A., & Gibbons, A. M. (2016). Developing and investigating the use of single-item measures in organizational research. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 21, 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039139

Galliker, M. (2016). Ist die Psychologie eine Wissenschaft? Ihre Krisen und Kontroversen von den Anfängen bis zur Gegenwart. Springer.

Gelman, A., Hill, J., & Vehtari, A. (2021). Regression and other stories. Cambridge University Press.

Graf, L. K. M., Mayer, S., & Landwehr, J. R. (2018). Measuring processing fluency: One versus five items. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 28, 393–411. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1021

Grant, S., Aitchison, T., Henderson, E., Christie, J., Zare, S., Murray, J. M., & Dargie, H. (1999). A Comparison of the Reproducibility and the Sensitivity to Change of Visual Analogue Scales, Borg Scales, and Likert Scales in Normal Subjects During Submaximal Exercise. CHEST, 116(5), 1208–1217. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.116.5.1208

Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit Social Cognition: Attitudes, Self-Esteem, and Stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102(1), 4–27.

Grewal, D., Monroe, K. B., & Krishnan, R. (1998). The effects of price-comparison advertising on buyers’ perceptions of acquisition value, transaction value, and behavioral intentions. Journal of Marketing, 62, 46–59. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252160

Gudmundsson, E. (2009). Guidelines for translating and adapting psychological instruments. Nordic Psychology, 61(2), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1027/1901-2276.61.2.29

Gulbins, J., & Kahrmann, C. (2000). Mut zur Typographie: ein Kurs für Desktop-Publishing ; mit 40 Tabellen (2., überarb. und erw. Aufl). Springer.

Hayes, A. F., & Coutts, J. J. (2020). Use Omega Rather than Cronbach’s Alpha for Estimating Reliability. But…. Communication Methods and Measures, 14(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2020.1718629

Heesen, B. (2021). Wissenschaftliches Arbeiten: Methodenwissen für Wirtschafts-, Ingenieur- und Sozialwissenschaftler. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-62548-4

Ho, C.-C., & MacDorman, K. F. (2010). Revisiting the uncanny valley theory: Developing and validating an alternative to the Godspeed indices. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1508–1518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.015

Hofstadter, D. R., Held, S., & Hofstadter, D. R. (2008). Ich bin eine seltsame Schleife (2. Aufl). Klett-Cotta.

Huntington-Klein, N. (2022). The effect: An introduction to research design and causality. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group. https://theeffectbook.net/

Jhangiani, R. S., Jhangiani, Chiang, I.-C. A., & Cuttler, D. C., Leighton. (2019). Research Methods in Psychology.

Jonas, K., Stroebe, W., & Hewstone, M. (Eds.). (2014). Sozialpsychologie. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41091-8

Kahneman, D. (2012). Schnelles Denken, langsames Denken. Siedler Verlag.

Kornmeier, M. (2013). Wissenschaftlich schreiben leicht gemacht (6th ed.). Haupt-Verlag.

Kruschke, J. K. (2018). Rejecting or Accepting Parameter Values in Bayesian Estimation. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2), 270–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918771304

Kruschke, J. K. (2021). Bayesian Analysis Reporting Guidelines. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(10, 10), 1282–1291. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01177-7

Kurdi, B., Lozano, S., & Banaji, M. R. (2017). Introducing the Open Affective Standardized Image Set (OASIS). Behavior Research Methods, 49(2), 457–470. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0715-3

Kwon, M., Kim, D.-J., Cho, H., & Yang, S. (2013). The smartphone addiction scale: Development and validation of a short version for adolescents. PloS One, 8(12), e83558. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083558

Labovitz, S. (1970). The Assignment of Numbers to Rank Order Categories. American Sociological Review, 35(3), 515–524. https://doi.org/10.2307/2093306

Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1999). International affective picture system (IAPS): Instruction manual and affective ratings. NIMH Center for the Study of Emotion and Attention.

Lewis, J. R., & Sauro, J. (2009). The Factor Structure of the System Usability Scale. In M. Kurosu (Ed.), Human Centered Design (pp. 94–103). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02806-9_12

Lienert, G. A., & Raatz, U. (1998). Testaufbau und Testanalyse (6. Auflage). Beltz, Psychologie Verlags Union.

Makowski, D., Ben-Shachar, M. S., Chen, S. H. A., & Lüdecke, D. (2019). Indices of Effect Existence and Significance in the Bayesian Framework. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02767

Maxham, J. G., & Netemeyer, R. G. (2002). A Longitudinal Study of Complaining Customers’ Evaluations of Multiple Service Failures and Recovery Efforts. Journal of Marketing, 66(4), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.66.4.57.18512

Michell, J., & Ernst, C. (1997). The Axioms of Quantity and the Theory of Measurement. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 41(4), 345–356. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9473397

Moosbrugger, H., & Kelava, A. (Eds.). (2012). Testtheorie und Fragebogenkonstruktion. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20072-4

Mueller, P. A., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2014). The Pen Is Mightier Than the Keyboard: Advantages of Longhand Over Laptop Note Taking. Psychological Science, 25(6), 1159–1168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614524581

Netemeyer, R. G., Haws, K. L., & Bearden, W. O. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook of marketing scales: Multi-item measures for marketing and consumer behavior research (3rd ed). SAGE.

Pearl, J., & Mackenzie, D. (2018). The book of why: The new science of cause and effect (First edition). Basic Books.

Peters, J. H., & Dörfler, T. (2015). Abschlussarbeiten in der Psychologie und den Sozialwissenschaften - Schreiben und Gestalten. Pearson. https://www.pearson-studium.de/schreiben-und-gestalten-von-abschlussarbeiten-in-der-psychologie-und-den-sozialwissenschaften.html

Peters, J. H., & Dörfler, T. (2019a). Planen, Durchführen und Auswerten von Abschlussarbeiten in der Psychologie und den Sozialwissenschaften. Pearson. https://www.pearson-studium.de/planen-durchfuehren-und-auswerten-von-abschlussarbeiten-in-der-psychologie-und-den-sozialwissenschaften.html

Peters, J. H., & Dörfler, T. (2019b). Schreiben und Gestalten von Abschlussarbeiten in der Psychologie und den Sozialwissenschaften. https://www.pearson-studium.de/drm/reader/nu/code/uesgvaaidpsy

Popper, K. (2013). Logik der Forschung (H. Keuth, Ed.). Akademie Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1524/9783050063782

Porst, R. (2014). Fragebogen: ein Arbeitsbuch (4., erweiterte Auflage). Springer.

Redondo, J., Fraga, I., Padrón, I., & Piñeiro, A. (2008). Affective ratings of sound stimuli. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 784–790. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.784

Reichardt, C. S. (2019). Quasi-experimentation: A guide to design and analysis. The Guilford Press.

Reiß, S., & Sarris, V. (2012). Experimentelle Psychologie: von der Theorie zur Praxis. Pearson.

Saint-Mont, U. (2015). Randomization Does Not Help Much, Comparability Does. PLoS ONE, 10(7), e0132102. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132102

Satow, L. (2011). B5T - Psychomeda Big-Five-Persönlichkeitstest. https://doi.org/10.23668/PSYCHARCHIVES.4530

Satow, L. (2020). B5T®. Big-Five-Persönlichkeitstest. https://doi.org/10.23668/PSYCHARCHIVES.4611

Sauer, S., & Lustig, L. (2023). The effect of Bringtnixtin on fluid intelligence: A randomized, controlled trial. Journal for Fake Data, 42(1), 271–314.

Schepman, A., & Rodway, P. (2022). The General Attitudes towards Artificial Intelligence Scale (GAAIS): Confirmatory Validation and Associations with Personality, Corporate Distrust, and General Trust. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 0(0), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2085400

Schönbrodt, F. D., Heene, M., Zehetleitner, M., Maier, M., Scheel, A. M., Zygar-Hoffmann, C., Schoedel, R., Sust, L., Schiestel, L., & Ihle, M. (2023). Open science initiative in psychology @LMU. OSF. osf.io/mgwk8

Schönbrodt, F. D., & Perugini, M. (2013). At what sample size do correlations stabilize? Journal of Research in Personality, 47(5), 609–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.05.009

Sindermann, C., Sha, P., Zhou, M., Wernicke, J., Schmitt, H. S., Li, M., Sariyska, R., Stavrou, M., Becker, B., & Montag, C. (2021). Assessing the Attitude Towards Artificial Intelligence: Introduction of a Short Measure in German, Chinese, and English Language. KI - Künstliche Intelligenz, 35(1), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-020-00689-0

Song, S. W., & Shin, M. (2022). Uncanny Valley Effects on Chatbot Trust, Purchase Intention, and Adoption Intention in the Context of E-Commerce: The Moderating Role of Avatar Familiarity. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 0(0), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2121038

Suh, W., & Ahn, S. (2022). Development and Validation of a Scale Measuring Student Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence. SAGE Open, 12(2), 21582440221100463. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221100463

Suppes, P. (1999). Introduction to logic. Dover Publications.

Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd

Theisen, M. R. (2021). Wissenschaftliches Arbeiten: erfolgreich bei Bachelor- und Masterarbeit (18., neu bearbeitete und gekürzte Auflage). Verlag Franz Vahlen.

Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x

Walach, H., & Stillfried, N. von. (2013). Psychologie: Wissenschaftstheorie, philosophische Grundlagen und Geschichte: ein Lehrbuch (3., überarb. und erw. Aufl). Kohlhammer.

Waldorf, M., Cordes, M., Vocks, S., & McCreary, D. (2016). Deutschsprachige Drive for Muscularity Scale (DMS). Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen (ZIS). https://doi.org/10.6102/ZIS246

Ward, A. F., Duke, K., Gneezy, A., & Bos, M. W. (2017). Brain Drain: The Mere Presence of One’s Own Smartphone Reduces Available Cognitive Capacity. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 2(2), 140–154. https://doi.org/10.1086/691462