References
Schlüsselwörter
Versuchsplanung, Statistik, R, Datenanalyse, Psychologie, Forschung
Adler, M. J., & Van Doren, C. (1972). How to read a book
(Rev. and updated ed). Simon and Schuster.
Al-Natour, S., Benbasat, I., & Cenfetelli, R. (2011). The
Adoption of Online Shopping Assistants:
Perceived Similarity as an Antecedent to
Evaluative Beliefs. Journal of the Association for
Information Systems, 12(5). https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00267
Amelang, M., & Schmidt-Atzert, L. (2012). Psychologische
Diagnostik. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17001-0
American Psychological Association. (2019). Publication
Manual of the American Psychological
Association, 7th Edition. American
Psychological Association (APA). https://www.amazon.com/Publication-Manual-American-Psychological-Association/dp/1433805618?SubscriptionId=0JYN1NVW651KCA56C102&tag=techkie-20&linkCode=xm2&camp=2025&creative=165953&creativeASIN=1433805618
Ariely, D. (2012). Die halbe Wahrheit ist die beste
Lüge: Wie wir andere täuschen–und uns selbst
am meisten. Droemer.
Ariely, D. (2015). Denken hilft zwar, nützt aber nichts: warum wir
immer wieder unvernünftige Entscheidungen treffen (M. Zybak &
G. Gockel, Trans.; Vollständige Taschenbuchausgabe).
Droemer.
Bangor, A., Kortum, P. T., & Miller, J. T. (2008). An
Empirical Evaluation of the System Usability
Scale. International Journal of Human–Computer
Interaction, 24(6), 574–594. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447310802205776
Bortz, J., & Döring, N. (2006). Forschungsmethoden und
Evaluation: Für Human- und
Sozialwissenschaftler (4. Auflage).
Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-540-33306-7
Brembs, B. (2018). Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to
Reach Even Average Reliability. Frontiers in Human
Neuroscience, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00037
Brembs, B., Button, K., & Munafò, M. (2013). Deep impact: Unintended
consequences of journal rank. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience,
7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00291
Brown, P. M., George, A. M., & Rickwood, D. J. (2021). Rash
impulsivity, reward seeking and fear of missing out as predictors of
texting while driving: Indirect effects via mobile phone
involvement. Personality and Individual Differences,
171, 110492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110492
Bühner, M. (2011). Einführung in die Test- und
Fragebogenkonstruktion. Pearson Studium.
https://books.google.de/books?id=Y4990CfV3wgC
Chalmers, A. F., & Chalmers, A. F. (2007). Wege der
Wissenschaft: Einführung in die Wissenschaftstheorie (N. Bergemann,
Ed.; 6., verb. Aufl). Springer.
Cialdini, R. B. (2017). Die Psychologie des Überzeugens: wie Sie
sich selbst und Ihren Mitmenschen auf die Schliche kommen (M.
Wengenroth, Trans.; 8., unveränderte Auflage). Hogrefe.
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin,
112(1), 155–159.
Cooper, H. (2020). Reporting standards for research in psychology:
Why do we need them? What might they be? In
Reporting quantitative research in psychology: How to
meet APA Style Journal Article Reporting Standards, 2nd
ed (pp. 3–17). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000178-001
Dienes, Z. (2008). Understanding psychology as a science: An
introduction to scientific and statistical inference.
Palgrave Macmillan.
Dobelli, R., & Lang, B. (2011). Die Kunst des
klaren Denkens. Hanser.
DPGs, B. und. (2016). Berufsethische Richtlinien.
Berufsverbandes Deutscher Psychologinnen und Psychologen e.V. und
der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie e.V. https://www.dgps.de/die-dgps/aufgaben-und-ziele/berufsethische-richtlinien
Eid, M., Gollwitzer, M., & Schmitt, M. (2013). Statistik und
Forschungsmethoden: Lehrbuch. Mit
Online-Materialien. Beltz. http://books.google.de/books?id=bTdHyoIbMSAC
Escalas, J. E., & Stern, B. B. (2003). Sympathy and
Empathy: Emotional Responses to
Advertising Dramas. Journal of Consumer Research,
29(4), 566–578. https://doi.org/10.1086/346251
Etcoff, N. L., Stock, S., Haley, L. E., Vickery, S. a., & House, D.
M. (2011). Cosmetics as a feature of the extended human phenotype:
Modulation of the perception of biologically important
facial signals. PLoS ONE, 6(10), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025656
Ferreira-Barbosa, H., García-Fernández, J., & Cepeda-Carrión, G.
(2023). The Mediating Role of e-Lifestyles to
Use the Fitness Center App. International
Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 0(0), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2204273
Fisher, G. G., Matthews, R. A., & Gibbons, A. M. (2016). Developing
and investigating the use of single-item measures in organizational
research. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology,
21, 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039139
Galliker, M. (2016). Ist die Psychologie eine
Wissenschaft? Ihre Krisen und
Kontroversen von den Anfängen bis zur
Gegenwart. Springer.
Gelman, A., Hill, J., & Vehtari, A. (2021). Regression and other
stories. Cambridge University Press.
Graf, L. K. M., Mayer, S., & Landwehr, J. R. (2018). Measuring
processing fluency: One versus five items. Journal of
Consumer Psychology, 28, 393–411. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1021
Grant, S., Aitchison, T., Henderson, E., Christie, J., Zare, S., Murray,
J. M., & Dargie, H. (1999). A Comparison of the
Reproducibility and the Sensitivity to
Change of Visual Analogue Scales, Borg
Scales, and Likert Scales in Normal Subjects
During Submaximal Exercise. CHEST, 116(5),
1208–1217. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.116.5.1208
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit Social
Cognition: Attitudes, Self-Esteem, and
Stereotypes. Psychological Review,
102(1), 4–27.
Grewal, D., Monroe, K. B., & Krishnan, R. (1998). The effects of
price-comparison advertising on buyers’ perceptions of acquisition
value, transaction value, and behavioral intentions. Journal of
Marketing, 62, 46–59. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252160
Gudmundsson, E. (2009). Guidelines for translating and adapting
psychological instruments. Nordic Psychology, 61(2),
29–45. https://doi.org/10.1027/1901-2276.61.2.29
Gulbins, J., & Kahrmann, C. (2000). Mut zur Typographie: ein
Kurs für Desktop-Publishing ; mit 40 Tabellen (2., überarb. und
erw. Aufl). Springer.
Hayes, A. F., & Coutts, J. J. (2020). Use Omega Rather
than Cronbach’s Alpha for Estimating
Reliability. But…. Communication Methods and
Measures, 14(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2020.1718629
Heesen, B. (2021). Wissenschaftliches Arbeiten: Methodenwissen für
Wirtschafts-, Ingenieur- und Sozialwissenschaftler. Springer
Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-62548-4
Ho, C.-C., & MacDorman, K. F. (2010). Revisiting the uncanny valley
theory: Developing and validating an alternative to the
Godspeed indices. Computers in Human Behavior,
26(6), 1508–1518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.015
Hofstadter, D. R., Held, S., & Hofstadter, D. R. (2008). Ich bin
eine seltsame Schleife (2. Aufl). Klett-Cotta.
Huntington-Klein, N. (2022). The effect: An introduction to research
design and causality. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis
Group. https://theeffectbook.net/
Jhangiani, R. S., Jhangiani, Chiang, I.-C. A., & Cuttler, D. C.,
Leighton. (2019). Research Methods in
Psychology.
Jonas, K., Stroebe, W., & Hewstone, M. (Eds.). (2014).
Sozialpsychologie. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41091-8
Kahneman, D. (2012). Schnelles Denken, langsames
Denken. Siedler Verlag.
Kornmeier, M. (2013). Wissenschaftlich schreiben leicht gemacht
(6th ed.). Haupt-Verlag.
Kruschke, J. K. (2018). Rejecting or Accepting Parameter
Values in Bayesian Estimation. Advances in
Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(2),
270–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918771304
Kruschke, J. K. (2021). Bayesian Analysis Reporting
Guidelines. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(10, 10),
1282–1291. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01177-7
Kurdi, B., Lozano, S., & Banaji, M. R. (2017). Introducing the
Open Affective Standardized Image Set (OASIS).
Behavior Research Methods, 49(2), 457–470. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0715-3
Kwon, M., Kim, D.-J., Cho, H., & Yang, S. (2013). The smartphone
addiction scale: Development and validation of a short version for
adolescents. PloS One, 8(12), e83558. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083558
Labovitz, S. (1970). The Assignment of Numbers
to Rank Order Categories. American Sociological
Review, 35(3), 515–524. https://doi.org/10.2307/2093306
Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1999). International
affective picture system (IAPS): Instruction
manual and affective ratings. NIMH Center for the Study of Emotion
and Attention.
Lewis, J. R., & Sauro, J. (2009). The Factor Structure
of the System Usability Scale. In M. Kurosu (Ed.),
Human Centered Design (pp. 94–103).
Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02806-9_12
Lienert, G. A., & Raatz, U. (1998). Testaufbau und
Testanalyse (6. Auflage). Beltz, Psychologie Verlags
Union.
Makowski, D., Ben-Shachar, M. S., Chen, S. H. A., & Lüdecke, D.
(2019). Indices of Effect Existence and
Significance in the Bayesian Framework.
Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02767
Maxham, J. G., & Netemeyer, R. G. (2002). A Longitudinal
Study of Complaining Customers’
Evaluations of Multiple Service Failures and
Recovery Efforts. Journal of Marketing,
66(4), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.66.4.57.18512
Michell, J., & Ernst, C. (1997). The Axioms of
Quantity and the Theory of
Measurement. Journal of Mathematical Psychology,
41(4), 345–356. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9473397
Moosbrugger, H., & Kelava, A. (Eds.). (2012). Testtheorie und
Fragebogenkonstruktion. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20072-4
Mueller, P. A., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2014). The Pen Is
Mightier Than the Keyboard: Advantages
of Longhand Over Laptop Note Taking. Psychological
Science, 25(6), 1159–1168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614524581
Netemeyer, R. G., Haws, K. L., & Bearden, W. O. (Eds.). (2011).
Handbook of marketing scales: Multi-item measures for marketing and
consumer behavior research (3rd ed). SAGE.
Pearl, J., & Mackenzie, D. (2018). The book of why: The new
science of cause and effect (First edition). Basic
Books.
Peters, J. H., & Dörfler, T. (2015). Abschlussarbeiten in der
Psychologie und den Sozialwissenschaften - Schreiben und Gestalten.
Pearson. https://www.pearson-studium.de/schreiben-und-gestalten-von-abschlussarbeiten-in-der-psychologie-und-den-sozialwissenschaften.html
Peters, J. H., & Dörfler, T. (2019a). Planen, Durchführen und
Auswerten von Abschlussarbeiten in der Psychologie und den
Sozialwissenschaften. Pearson. https://www.pearson-studium.de/planen-durchfuehren-und-auswerten-von-abschlussarbeiten-in-der-psychologie-und-den-sozialwissenschaften.html
Peters, J. H., & Dörfler, T. (2019b). Schreiben und Gestalten
von Abschlussarbeiten in der Psychologie und den
Sozialwissenschaften. https://www.pearson-studium.de/drm/reader/nu/code/uesgvaaidpsy
Popper, K. (2013). Logik der Forschung (H. Keuth,
Ed.). Akademie Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1524/9783050063782
Porst, R. (2014). Fragebogen: ein Arbeitsbuch (4., erweiterte
Auflage). Springer.
Redondo, J., Fraga, I., Padrón, I., & Piñeiro, A. (2008). Affective
ratings of sound stimuli. Behavior Research Methods,
40(3), 784–790. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.784
Reichardt, C. S. (2019). Quasi-experimentation: A guide to design
and analysis. The Guilford Press.
Reiß, S., & Sarris, V. (2012). Experimentelle Psychologie: von
der Theorie zur Praxis. Pearson.
Saint-Mont, U. (2015). Randomization Does Not Help Much,
Comparability Does. PLoS ONE, 10(7),
e0132102. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132102
Satow, L. (2011). B5T - Psychomeda
Big-Five-Persönlichkeitstest. https://doi.org/10.23668/PSYCHARCHIVES.4530
Satow, L. (2020). B5T®. Big-Five-Persönlichkeitstest. https://doi.org/10.23668/PSYCHARCHIVES.4611
Sauer, S., & Lustig, L. (2023). The effect of
Bringtnixtin on fluid intelligence: A
randomized, controlled trial. Journal for Fake Data,
42(1), 271–314.
Schepman, A., & Rodway, P. (2022). The General
Attitudes towards Artificial Intelligence Scale
(GAAIS): Confirmatory Validation and
Associations with Personality, Corporate
Distrust, and General Trust. International
Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 0(0), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2085400
Schönbrodt, F. D., Heene, M., Zehetleitner, M., Maier, M., Scheel, A.
M., Zygar-Hoffmann, C., Schoedel, R., Sust, L., Schiestel, L., &
Ihle, M. (2023). Open science initiative in psychology
@LMU. OSF. osf.io/mgwk8
Schönbrodt, F. D., & Perugini, M. (2013). At what sample size do
correlations stabilize? Journal of Research in Personality,
47(5), 609–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.05.009
Sindermann, C., Sha, P., Zhou, M., Wernicke, J., Schmitt, H. S., Li, M.,
Sariyska, R., Stavrou, M., Becker, B., & Montag, C. (2021).
Assessing the Attitude Towards Artificial Intelligence:
Introduction of a Short Measure in
German, Chinese, and English
Language. KI - Künstliche Intelligenz, 35(1),
109–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-020-00689-0
Song, S. W., & Shin, M. (2022). Uncanny Valley Effects
on Chatbot Trust, Purchase Intention, and
Adoption Intention in the Context of
E-Commerce: The Moderating Role of
Avatar Familiarity. International Journal of
Human–Computer Interaction, 0(0), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2121038
Suh, W., & Ahn, S. (2022). Development and Validation
of a Scale Measuring Student Attitudes Toward Artificial
Intelligence. SAGE Open, 12(2),
21582440221100463. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221100463
Suppes, P. (1999). Introduction to logic. Dover
Publications.
Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of
Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical
Education, 2, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
Theisen, M. R. (2021). Wissenschaftliches Arbeiten: erfolgreich bei
Bachelor- und Masterarbeit (18., neu bearbeitete und gekürzte
Auflage). Verlag Franz Vahlen.
Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology Acceptance
Model 3 and a Research Agenda on
Interventions. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x
Walach, H., & Stillfried, N. von. (2013). Psychologie:
Wissenschaftstheorie, philosophische Grundlagen und Geschichte: ein
Lehrbuch (3., überarb. und erw. Aufl). Kohlhammer.
Waldorf, M., Cordes, M., Vocks, S., & McCreary, D. (2016).
Deutschsprachige Drive for Muscularity Scale (DMS). Zusammenstellung
sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen (ZIS). https://doi.org/10.6102/ZIS246
Ward, A. F., Duke, K., Gneezy, A., & Bos, M. W. (2017). Brain
Drain: The Mere Presence of One’s
Own Smartphone Reduces Available Cognitive Capacity.
Journal of the Association for Consumer Research,
2(2), 140–154. https://doi.org/10.1086/691462